Why is the definition of a Muslim often adjusted by Islamic theology?
The definition of a Muslim is often adjusted by Islamic theology when discussing the previous prophets. This shift in definition appears to serve the purpose of creating continuity between the earlier prophetic traditions and Islam. Here's how this adjustment works and the implications it carries:
1. Broad Definition: Submission to God
- Muslims often claim that all prophets, from Adam to Jesus, were Muslims because they submitted to the will of God.
- This broad definition is generalized and stripped of specific Quranic criteria, making it easier to argue that figures from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament align with Islam.
- However, this definition ignores the fact that these prophets operated under different revelations, covenants, and understandings of God that are not consistent with the Quran.
2. Narrow Definition: Quranic Muslim
- In contrast, the specific definition of a Muslim in Islam is:
- Someone who believes in Allah as described in the Quran.
- Submits to the teachings of the Quran.
- Accepts Muhammad as the final prophet.
- By this definition, it is clear that the prophets of the previous scriptures cannot be Muslims, as they:
- Did not know of Muhammad or the Quran.
- Believed in a God whose nature (e.g., the relational YHWH or the Trinitarian God) differs fundamentally from Allah of the Quran.
3. The Contradiction
- When discussing the prophets of the previous scriptures, Muslims revert to the broad definition to claim figures like Abraham, Moses, and Jesus were Muslims.
- When discussing Islam as the final and complete revelation, they apply the narrow definition, emphasizing the necessity of belief in Muhammad and the Quran.
- This selective application of definitions creates a contradiction that serves to claim the heritage of the Abrahamic faiths while maintaining Islam’s exclusivity.
4. The Strategy Behind the Definition Shift
- To Establish Continuity: By claiming that all prophets were Muslims, Islam positions itself as the final and perfected version of the monotheistic tradition.
- To Discredit Other Faiths: By asserting that earlier scriptures were corrupted and that Islam restores the original faith, Muslims can claim theological superiority.
- To Claim Authority Over Abrahamic Prophets: The idea that Abraham, Moses, and Jesus were Muslims allows Islam to appropriate their authority while rejecting the scriptures and teachings associated with them.
5. The Problem with This Approach
- Historical Inconsistency: The teachings and practices of the previous prophets do not align with the Quran or Sharia. For example:
- Abraham’s covenant with God included circumcision, which Islam affirms, but his sacrificial system and personal interactions with YHWH are absent from Islamic practice.
- Moses gave the Israelites the Torah, a detailed legal code that is distinct from the Quranic Sharia.
- Jesus emphasized grace, love, and salvation through His own sacrifice, concepts Islam rejects outright.
- Theological Contradictions: The nature of God in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament (e.g., relational, Trinitarian in Christianity) fundamentally differs from the Quran’s portrayal of Allah.
- Illogical Claims: Retroactively declaring prophets as Muslims disregards the historical and cultural contexts of their messages, turning them into mere precursors to Islam rather than figures central to their own faith traditions.
6. Logical Conclusion
The selective redefinition of a Muslim:
- Is inconsistent and unsustainable when examined critically.
- Undermines the distinct teachings and roles of the prophets in their respective faiths.
- Demonstrates an attempt to retroactively unify diverse traditions under the Islamic umbrella, which fails under theological and historical scrutiny.
Final Thought
The shifting definition of a Muslim reveals a strategic inconsistency aimed at appropriating the authority of earlier prophets while denying the validity of their original messages. When this inconsistency is exposed, it becomes clear that the prophets of the previous scriptures were not Muslims in any meaningful sense, but rather adherents to distinct, God-ordained covenants that Islam seeks to overwrite.
No comments:
Post a Comment