Quran Contradiction 

 What kind of book is the Injil? 

The Quran makes the following statements about the Injil:

📌 The Core Contradiction

The Qur'an makes two mutually exclusive claims about the Injil (Gospel):

1. Claim A – Injil Given To Jesus (as a revealed scripture, like the Qur'an was to Muhammad):

   • Surah 5:46: "We gave him [Jesus] the Injil."

   • Surah 19:30: Jesus says, “He has given me the Book.”

   • Surah 3:3: “He sent down the Torah and the Injil.”

2. Claim B – Injil With the Christians (a corpus they still possess in Muhammad’s time):

   • Surah 5:47: “Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein.”

   • Surah 5:68: “...until you uphold the Torah and the Gospel...”

   • Surah 7:157: “...the Messenger whom they find written in the Torah and the Gospel with them.”

These cannot both be true if taken literally and historically. Why?

---

🔍 Historical and Forensic Analysis

Fact 1: The New Testament (NT) was not given to Jesus. It was written by his disciples and followers after his ascension (c. 40–100 AD). It contains:

• Four Gospels (biographical accounts about Jesus),

• Acts, Epistles, and Revelation (none written by Jesus).

Fact 2: Nowhere in Christian tradition or history is there a claim of a single “book” given to Jesus. The NT was recognized and canonized over time; no record exists of a Jesus-revealed scripture being lost or suppressed. That concept is absent from Christian theology.

---

⚖️ Logical Implication

The Qur’an claims:

• A book was given to Jesus → No such book exists or was ever claimed.

• That book is with Christians during Muhammad’s time → What Christians had was the New Testament, not a “book given to Jesus.”

Therefore:

🧠 If Claim A is true (book given to Jesus), Claim B is false (NT ≠ that book).
🧠 If Claim B is true (Christians still have the book), Claim A is false (Jesus never received such a book).

The Quran affirms both — which is a contradiction.

---

🛑 “Bible Is Corrupted” Rebuttal

1. No Quranic Support: The Qur’an never states the Injil was corrupted. It accuses some Jews of misusing the Torah (e.g., Surah 2:79), but never charges Christians with corrupting the Injil.

2. Corruption ≠ Transformation of Genre: Even if the Injil was “corrupted,” this does not explain a shift from a revelation given to Jesus into a biographical compilation by others. This is not a textual alteration; it is an entirely different genre and origin.

3. Historical Impossibility: If the original Injil existed and was replaced by a completely different scripture (NT), early Christians would have noticed. There’s no record—zero—of outrage, resistance, or mention of a “lost Injil.”

---

🔄 Muslim Counter-Arguments & Their Collapse

• “The original Injil was lost”: Then it cannot be the book “with them” during Muhammad’s time (Surah 5:47, 5:68, 7:157).

• “The NT is partially inspired”: But that undermines the Quran’s command to judge by what is in it.

• “The NT mentions a Gospel of Jesus”: It doesn’t. The “Gospel of...” titles refer to authorship or content about Jesus, not a divine scripture he received.

---

💣 Conclusion: This Is a Quranic Error

Conclusion (from logic and evidence):

The Qur’an makes a demonstrably false assumption about the nature of Christian scripture — that the Injil was a book given to Jesus and still present with Christians in Muhammad’s time.

This contradiction cannot be resolved through interpretation, tradition, or appeal to corruption. It reflects a false projection of Muhammad’s own revelatory experience onto earlier figures, particularly Jesus.

Logical status: Internal contradiction + historical falsehood = proof the Qur’an is not infallible or divinely authored.