Part 4: Silencing the Scholars — The Price of Questioning Muhammad

7-part series: “The Untouchable Prophet: How Islam Enforces Total Submission to Muhammad”

In Islam, Thinking Too Hard About the Prophet Can Get You Killed

Religions have long wrestled with uncomfortable questions about their founders. Christian theologians debate Jesus’s humanity. Buddhist scholars dissect Siddhartha’s teachings. Even Jewish sages challenge interpretations of Moses.

But in Islam, the Prophet Muhammad is not up for discussion.
He is to be obeyed, not analyzed.

Any serious attempt to evaluate Muhammad — historically, ethically, or theologically — is treated as subversion. The punishment? Marginalization, excommunication, exile… or execution.

Islam doesn’t just protect Muhammad from slander. It protects him from scrutiny. And even the most devout Muslims have learned this the hard way.

---

1. The Rule Is Simple: Don’t Touch the Prophet

The Islamic intellectual tradition has many streams — legal, philosophical, mystical. But there's one rule that overrides all others:

You can debate God’s will. You cannot question the Prophet’s words or actions.

Why?

Because Muhammad’s authority is considered:

• Absolute (his commands are binding),

• Infallible (protected from error via the doctrine of ‘Ismah),

• Final (the “Seal of the Prophets” who cannot be superseded).

So if a scholar challenges a hadith where Muhammad does something morally dubious, or questions the historicity of his life, it’s not treated as academic disagreement.

It’s treated as apostasy.

---

2. Case Studies in Punishment — Real Muslim Intellectuals, Real Repression

Nasr Abu Zayd (Egypt) — Excommunicated for Treating the Qur’an as Literature

• A devout Muslim and Quranic scholar.

• Argued that the Qur’an should be understood as a text — with human linguistic and cultural context — rather than as a static, eternal command.

• Also explored how Hadiths and Prophet narratives were shaped over time.

The Result:

• Declared an apostate by Egyptian courts in 1995.

• Forced to flee the country.

• His marriage was annulled by the state against his will under Islamic law (since an apostate cannot remain married to a Muslim woman).

His crime? Treating Islamic texts — and by extension, Muhammad’s legacy — as open to interpretation.

---

Mahmoud Mohammed Taha (Sudan) — Executed for Advocating Reform

• Proposed a new understanding of Islam based on the Meccan verses of the Qur’an (which are more peaceful and egalitarian), over the more violent Medinan ones.

• Essentially, he argued Muhammad’s later life was context-specific, and shouldn't be used as a timeless model.

The Result:

• Tried for apostasy in 1985 under Sudanese Islamic law.

• Executed by hanging at age 76.

His crime? Suggesting that not all of Muhammad’s example was eternally valid.

---

Fatima Mernissi (Morocco) — Marginalized for Challenging Hadiths

• A Muslim feminist scholar who analyzed Hadiths that justify female subjugation.

• Argued that many were fabricated or politically motivated.

• Highlighted inconsistencies in reports about Muhammad’s actions toward women.

The Result:

• Pushed to the fringes of Islamic academia.

• Faced constant accusations of blasphemy and Westernization.

Her crime? Questioning the Prophet’s moral authority on gender roles.

---

Mohammed Arkoun (Algeria/France) — Ignored for Demythologizing Islam

• Attempted to bring critical historiography to the study of early Islam.

• Warned against treating Muhammad as beyond human analysis.

• Promoted a secular, historical approach to Islamic origins.

The Result:

• Largely excluded from mainstream Islamic discourse.

• Accused of undermining faith and disrespecting the Prophet.

His crime? Treating Muhammad as a historical figure rather than a sacred symbol.

---

3. It’s Not About Apostasy — It’s About the Prophet

These scholars weren’t atheists. Most weren’t even trying to leave Islam.

Their core sin was that they refused to:

• Blindly accept every Hadith.

• Treat Muhammad’s actions as eternally binding.

• Censor themselves when the Prophet’s behavior conflicted with modern ethics.

In short, they treated Muhammad as a man — not a moral oracle.

That’s all it takes.

Islamic orthodoxy doesn’t care if you believe in Allah.
It cares whether you submit to Muhammad.

---

4. Theological Thought-Policing: A Systemic Pattern

This enforcement isn't just cultural — it’s legal and institutional in many Muslim-majority countries.

• Blasphemy laws are most often triggered not by insults to God, but by criticism or satire of Muhammad.

• Religious universities such as Al-Azhar in Egypt or Qom in Iran serve as gatekeepers of doctrinal purity.

• Book bans, fatwas, and death threats routinely target thinkers who re-evaluate Muhammad’s legacy.

The message is unmistakable:

You are free to think — as long as your thoughts do not challenge the Prophet.

---

5. Even Secular Muslims Are Not Safe

This isn’t limited to academics. Ex-Muslims, reformists, or liberal Muslims who speak publicly about Muhammad’s violence, sexual behavior, or authoritarian rule face:

• Character assassination (labeled Islamophobes, heretics, or Zionist agents)

• Platform censorship (especially in Muslim countries or in Western media fearing backlash)

• Physical threats — sometimes death

In many ways, Islam functions like a regime where Muhammad is the Supreme Leader — and criticism of his person is sedition.

This is not reverence. This is ideological tyranny.

---

Conclusion: The Prophet Is Off-Limits — Even to the Faithful

Muhammad isn’t just immune from critique by outsiders.
He’s protected even from believers.

In Islam, intellectual integrity ends where the Prophet begins.

You can discuss divine mercy.
You can explore Qur’anic ambiguity.
You can debate legal rulings.

But once you ask:

• “Was Muhammad wrong?”

• “Did he act unjustly?”

• “Should we question this Hadith?”

The door slams shut.

You’re no longer a thinker.
You’re a blasphemer.

Islam doesn’t just shield Muhammad from slander — it shields him from truth.

And in doing so, it silences its most thoughtful voices in the name of sacred conformity.

Next: Part 5 – Sacred Name, Sacred Silence: How Even Uttering 'Muhammad' Is Regulated