Part VI: Female Slaves and Sex in the Name of God
Welcome to the dark heart of divine patriarchy — where rape becomes reward, women become war booty, and sacred scripture becomes a license for lifelong sexual ownership.
This isn’t some fringe interpretation. This is mainstream, legally enshrined, prophetically modeled doctrine. Islam didn’t merely tolerate sexual slavery. It legitimized it, canonized it, and practiced it at every level — from the Qur’an’s pages to Muhammad’s bedchamber.
Let’s torch the veils, incinerate the excuses, and expose the doctrine for what it is.
π “Right Hands Possess”: God’s Favorite Legal Loophole
There are few phrases in Islamic scripture more perverse — or more frequent — than “those your right hands possess” (ma malakat aymanukum). It’s Islam’s sanitized term for female slaves — women who can be owned, raped, and discarded without a whisper of sin.
This phrase appears in at least 15 separate Qur’anic verses, including:
Qur’an 4:3 – "Marry women of your choice... or those your right hands possess."
Qur’an 4:24 – "Married women are forbidden to you... except those your right hands possess."
Qur’an 23:5–6 – "Guard your private parts except with your wives or what your right hands possess."
Qur’an 33:50 – Specific exemptions for Muhammad to sexually access slaves taken as war spoils.
This isn’t poetic metaphor. This is legal policy. A divine green light for sexual slavery.
And yes, married women were included. Qur’an 4:24 explicitly annuls their previous marriages upon capture — a grotesque twist that permits rape by conquest.
π Tafsir al-Jalalayn (on 4:24):
“This verse means it is lawful to have intercourse with those captives, even if they were married before their capture, for their marriage is annulled.”
π Ibn Kathir:
“The enslavement of a married woman renders her previous marriage null, and intercourse is permissible for the new master.”
Read that again: a woman's marriage is canceled by capture. In Islamic law, war overrides marriage, and rape becomes reward.
π§ Muhammad: The Model of Divine Ownership
Apologists love to spin tales of Muhammad as a liberator of slaves. The Hadiths tell another story.
He owned slaves. Traded slaves. Gifted slaves. Took concubines. All of this is authenticated in canonical sources:
Sahih Muslim 3371
“The Prophet took a woman as his share from the captives on the day of Khaybar…”
Sahih Bukhari 254
“The Prophet took a slave girl from the fifth (of war booty) and kept her for himself.”
His concubines included:
Rayhana bint Zayd – enslaved after her tribe (Banu Qurayza) was exterminated.
Maria al-Qibtiyya – gifted to him by Egypt; became his concubine and mother of his son.
Safiyya bint Huyayy – taken as booty the same night her husband was executed at Khaybar.
No consent. No choice. Just captivity and divine privilege.
Muhammad was not reluctantly tolerating an evil. He was actively participating in it — and by extension, establishing an eternal prophetic precedent.
⚖️ Sharia Law: Sexual Slavery Made Sacred
Islamic jurisprudence didn’t merely allow sex with slaves. It enshrined it.
π Umdat al-Salik (Shafi’i manual, m5.6):
“It is permissible to have intercourse with a female slave one owns, even if she does not give her permission.”
π Hanafi Jurisprudence (Al-Hidayah):
“A man may have sexual relations with his slave woman without her consent, provided she is not married to another man.”
π Maliki Fiqh (Al-Risalah):
“The owner of a female slave may have intercourse with her as long as she is not pregnant by another man.”
The legality is not debated. It’s unanimous. And there are no clauses for consent, emotion, trauma, or age.
Let that sink in: Sharia defines lawful sex as ownership, not consent.
π©Έ Purity Is the Only Barrier — Not Will
The only sexual restriction? Menstrual status. That’s it.
Sahih Muslim 3373
“It is permissible to have intercourse with a captive woman after she is purified from menstruation.”
Forget her trauma. Forget her marriage. Forget her humanity.
As long as she’s not bleeding, she’s fair game.
And this isn’t a theoretical footnote. It became law.
𧬠Children of Concubines: Birthed Under Bondage
Children born from slave women were owned by the father, and often stigmatized as "ibn amah" — child of a slave.
Though they were technically free, they were:
Denied equal inheritance by some jurists.
Socially marked as “second-class blood.”
Raised in a system that normalized their mothers’ sexual exploitation.
There is no mechanism in Sharia for female slaves to refuse sex, and no avenue for emancipation except by the owner's will or death.
πͺ Buying, Selling, Gifting Women Like Livestock
Sex slaves were property. That meant:
They could be sold at markets.
They could be gifted to allies.
They could be inherited by heirs.
Sahih Muslim 1467a
“Ali bin Abu Talib inherited slave women from the Prophet.”
There are no verses limiting the number of concubines. While free wives were capped at four, a man could own dozens of slave women — as did caliphs like Harun al-Rashid and al-Mansur.
π Ibn Qayyim (Zad al-Ma’ad, Vol 1):
“The Prophet had sexual relations with multiple slave girls who were part of his property.”
This wasn’t fringe behavior. This was sunnah — prophetic emulation.
⚔️ Jihad and the Divine Pimping System
Conquests in early Islam were not just for land or faith — they were sexually incentivized.
Slaves were part of war booty.
Female captives were divided among fighters.
Sexual access was not only allowed — it was celebrated.
Qur’an 8:41
“And know that whatever you take as spoils... a fifth is for Allah and the Messenger…”
This "fifth" — al-khums — included slave girls, who were then distributed, sold, or kept as concubines.
Ibn Ishaq (Sirat Rasul Allah):
“The Prophet divided the captive women of Khaybar among his followers.”
This wasn't incidental. This was a systemic sex reward structure, enforced by religious law and blessed by divine command.
π Global Slavery Under the Banner of Islam
Islamic sexual slavery outlasted the transatlantic slave trade by nearly a thousand years.
Trans-Saharan Slave Trade (7th–20th century): Estimated 17 million Africans enslaved.
Castration of male slaves to protect harems — common under Abbasid and Ottoman rule.
Arab slave markets flourished in Mecca, Baghdad, Cairo, and Zanzibar.
π Bernard Lewis ("Race and Slavery in the Middle East"):
“Islamic slavery was not merely a passive inheritance... it was institutionally central and scripturally rooted.”
Even in the 20th and 21st centuries:
Saudi Arabia officially abolished slavery in 1962.
Mauritania outlawed slavery in 1981, criminalized it in 2007, and still struggles with enforcement.
ISIS revived Qur’anic slavery in 2014–2019, justifying Yazidi rape with Qur’an 4:24.
Their theological justifications weren’t invented — they were revived.
π§ The Psychological Fallout: Generations of Exploitation
For over a millennium, women in Islamic societies faced a world where:
Their bodies were commodities.
Their trauma was invisible.
Their silence was sanctified.
Female slaves weren’t just raped. They were taught it was holy. Their cries weren’t heard. Their scars weren’t seen. Their pain wasn’t sin — their resistance was.
π₯ Apologetics Can't Whitewash Rape
Let’s vaporize the excuses:
❌ “They were treated well.”
Ownership and rape are not negated by politeness. That’s like praising a smiling executioner.
❌ “This was normal back then.”
So was burning widows, crucifixion, and child sacrifice. Moral codes should rise above trends — not mimic them.
❌ “Muhammad was merciful to his slaves.”
Mercy does not undo ownership, rape, and silence. If your ethics start with “he raped her kindly,” you’ve already lost.
❌ “Islam eventually banned slavery.”
Not in the Qur’an. Not in Hadith. Not in fiqh. Slavery ended through secular modernity — often over clerical objections.
𧨠Final Verdict: Sexual Slavery Wasn’t the Exception — It Was the System
Islam didn’t condemn sexual slavery. It built it. Modeled it. Defended it. Immortalized it.
This wasn’t just a moral blind spot. It was a divine design — written in revelation, practiced by the Prophet, institutionalized by law, and revived by terrorists.
Until Islam formally denounces, disavows, and deletes these doctrines — not reinterprets them — the legacy stands.
And it stands on the backs of generations of silenced, violated women.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This post critiques Islam as an ideology, doctrine, and historical system — not Muslims as individuals. Every human deserves dignity. Beliefs do not. Truth-telling is not hate. Silence is.
Next: Part VII: Feminist Apologetics and the Great Gaslighting Campaign
No comments:
Post a Comment