Part III: Sharia and the Legal Subjugation of Women
So far, we’ve exposed the Qur’an’s blueprint and Muhammad’s execution of patriarchal control. Now let’s follow the fallout: Sharia law — Islam’s divine constitution.
Sharia doesn’t just reflect historical patriarchy. It metastasizes it — giving male dominance the permanence of sacred jurisprudence. It’s not optional. It’s not cultural. It’s not “misinterpreted.” It’s the logical, legal child of Islam’s primary sources.
Welcome to codified subjugation, signed by Allah and sealed by centuries of clerical ink.
📚 What is Sharia?
Sharia (الشريعة) — “the way” — is not a single book. It’s a jurisprudential Frankenstein, stitched together from:
The Qur’an (law's divine anchor),
Hadiths (legal precedents via Muhammad’s example),
Ijma’ (consensus of scholars),
Qiyas (analogical reasoning).
The result? Four major Sunni madhhabs (schools of law) — Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali — and a unanimous verdict: Women are spiritually inferior, legally deficient, and sexually regulated.
This isn’t legal diversity. It’s a united front of God-ordained gender apartheid.
⚖️ Marriage: Contract or Command Chain?
Marriage in Sharia isn’t mutual love. It’s a contract of male authority and female submission.
Umdat al-Salik (Shafi’i manual, Reliance of the Traveller):
“A woman may not marry herself off in marriage... the marriage is invalid unless her guardian agrees.” [m3.3]
Translation: A woman can’t even choose her husband without male oversight.
Hanafi Fiqh (Hidayah, Vol. 1):
Girls can be married off before puberty by their guardians. Legally binding. Consummation pending menstruation? Not required. Just physical capability.
Maliki Fiqh (Al-Risalah):
Men are encouraged to marry virgins, as “they are more obedient and sweeter in speech.”
What century are we in?
🔨 Divorce: One Word for Men, Legal Labyrinth for Women
Men get talaq — unilateral, no-fault, instant divorce by simply saying “I divorce you” three times.
Women? They get khula — divorce by begging a court, forfeiting her dowry, and requiring the husband’s consent. If he refuses? Too bad.
Umdat al-Salik n1.1:
“Khula is divorce at the request of the wife in return for compensation to the husband.”
Yes, she pays to leave him — even if he beats her.
👩⚖️ Courtroom Inequality: Two Women = One Man
We covered this in the Qur’an (2:282), but in Sharia it gets worse.
Reliance of the Traveller o24.7:
“Testimony of a woman equals half that of a man in financial matters. In cases of hudud (criminal punishments), women's testimony is inadmissible.”
Let that sink in:
Two women for a financial case.
Zero women in criminal cases like rape, theft, or apostasy.
Victim of rape? Your testimony isn’t enough to convict. You need four male witnesses.
And if you don’t provide them?
Qur’an 24:4: “Those who accuse chaste women and do not bring four witnesses... flog them eighty stripes.”
Welcome to a system where reporting rape can get you flogged. This isn’t justice. This is a theological gag order.
🧒 Child Marriage: Legalized Pedophilia
Muhammad set the precedent. Sharia seals it.
Hanafi Law (Hidayah, Vol. 1):
“A guardian may contract a marriage on behalf of a minor.”
Umdat al-Salik m3.13:
“The father may marry off his daughter before puberty without her permission.”
And when can consummation occur?
Imam Nawawi, Commentary on Sahih Muslim:
“If the girl is capable of sexual intercourse, the husband may consummate the marriage.”
Capability. Not consent. Not age.
This is not a loophole. It is a policy.
🏠 Custody and Guardianship: Fathers Own the Future
Even when women win custody in early childhood, once the child hits a certain age (often 7 for boys, puberty for girls), custody reverts to the father.
Reliance of the Traveller m13.4:
“A male child is given to the father when able to care for himself; a girl when she reaches puberty.”
Translation: A woman carries, births, and raises a child — but ownership defaults to the man.
And no, she can’t act as a legal guardian for her kids. Or herself. Or her property without male oversight.
💄 Dress Code of Control: Modesty as Law
The infamous ‘awrah principle defines a woman’s body as a source of temptation — therefore subject to strict regulation.
Reliance of the Traveller f5.3:
“The nakedness of a woman is her entire body except the face and hands.”
In many interpretations, even face and hands are included — hence niqab and burqa mandates.
What happens if she refuses?
Public shaming.
Legal punishment.
Even imprisonment in countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia.
“Modesty” is not a moral ideal. In Sharia, it’s a legal weapon against female visibility.
💰 Inheritance: Born to Get Less
Qur’an 4:11 — codified in every school of fiqh:
“To the male, the portion of two females.”
Because men “financially provide.” Even when they don’t.
No woman, no matter her wealth, out-earns a man’s automatic double share.
Fairness isn’t the point. Submission is.
🚫 Apostasy, Freedom, and the Female Trap
If a Muslim woman leaves Islam?
Death penalty.
Reliance of the Traveller o8.1:
“When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.”
Oh, and she can’t marry a non-Muslim man — ever.
Because Islam treats women as gateways to the community — not agents of their own belief.
🔥 The Unholy Union of Text and Law
Every humiliation, restriction, and subordination of women under Sharia is not a misapplication — it’s an application. A deliberate one.
It flows directly from:
Qur’anic revelation,
Prophetic example,
Legal consensus.
There is no “feminist Islam” within the bounds of traditional Sharia. There is only submission to male authority masquerading as piety.
🧨 Final Verdict: Sharia Isn’t Justice. It’s Gendered Tyranny in God’s Name.
From the bedroom to the courtroom, from headscarf to headcount, Sharia carves a legal system where women are:
Property before puberty,
Wombs with no rights,
Witnesses with no weight,
Citizens with no say.
It’s not misunderstood. It’s not distorted.
It’s consistent.
Sharia does not elevate women. It entraps them — with divine signatures at the bottom of every clause.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This post critiques Islam as an ideology, doctrine, and historical system — not Muslims as individuals. Every human deserves dignity. Beliefs do not. Truth-telling is not hate. Silence is.
Next: Part IV: Hijab, Niqab, and the Dress Code of Control?
No comments:
Post a Comment